4.+Assessment+and+Evaluation+work

__Assessment Work__
__Heres the assessment plan with the image removed. Paula Mar 16th__ As per skype call, cleaned up, preamble para/page, in word format for Annette. Paula [Brad - got it, looks good at first review!] [BRAD 13 Mar - Paula - I like it, the scalar referred to has been updated and I assume we'll be adding it to the paper as a figure. Therefore, you can ref it in this portion as "as depicted in figure XX" for now.]

Same doc as above, as Word docx. Paula

ALL BELOW THIS LINE IS OUT OF DATE INFORMATION ALL BELOW THIS LINE IS OUT OF DATE INFORMATION ALL BELOW THIS LINE IS OUT OF DATE INFORMATION ALL BELOW THIS LINE IS OUT OF DATE INFORMATION ALL BELOW THIS LINE IS OUT OF DATE INFORMATION ALL BELOW THIS LINE IS OUT OF DATE INFORMATION ALL BELOW THIS LINE IS OUT OF DATE INFORMATION ALL BELOW THIS LINE IS OUT OF DATE INFORMATION ALL BELOW THIS LINE IS OUT OF DATE INFORMATION


 * __ALL PREVIOUS WORK AND DISCUSSION UNDER THIS LINE__**

This is the latest copy with Paulas inputs to Brads points. Feb 28th. saved as 97-2003 word doc, hope it works for Annette. P As far as including an assessment para, please be cognisant that I indicated something in each EC. For the main EC (T0013 Advise on DL), I put "This EC will be conducted upon successful completion of ECs 0013.01 to ECs 0013.05, which relate to the formative assessment, or confirming “building blocks” to this final assessment." I also stated that each EC would be performed after each EO (in a sim setting, class setting, etc, appropriate to the needs of that particular assessment. As for how it ties into the larger PC, I think this is beyond the scope of our report. The rubric does not ask for anything outside of our 6 LOS, and our summative assessment is that of EC 0013 (Advise on DL). In addition (I just went back to the Mother Scalar), we may be opening somewhat of a can of worms linking EC to PC due to the notion that we have amended the little scalar without adjusting the Mom. If you look you'll see some complexity in that out Advise on DL is still sub to another Task, then the PO/PC. It may take time and adjustment to link it up.  Brad if you feel we really need it, and want to add more than this, have at er. Annette, thoughts? Paula [BRAD - fine with me. Can we add just a little itty bitty statement that reminds the reader of the report that this assessment plan is one part of a larger plan that includes the whole PO? Just to let the reader know we've thought of it? ]

Gang: Task 0013 Advise on DL is a summative EC. Forms part of a larger course for a TDO, (including assessment formative/summative in other areas)

Brad checked this and made some grammar/spelling changes and has inserted some comments and questions.

.doc version (same as docx)

=
{Paula} Hi guys, this is my crack at assessment plan. Pls have a look early as possible. You both have carte blanche to amend so that it fits instructional and overall content pieces you are working on IAW rubric. If significant alterations are needed pls let me know early as possible, and I'll do whats required.===== [Brad - I see the ECs and it will take me a bit of dedicated time this weekend to review them. As such we are still missing a "plan" as it were and also missing is a link to the higher level PC (or was it embedded in comments in the ECs somewhere? As I review I will see if it is there). As we review this we may wish to try to build a tabular or paragraph form to articulate the plan for assessment - the kind you'd find in the TP (in the Air Force) or in the TE assessment plan/strategy orders.]

=
QS: A-P1-211-E02/PC-H01 Qualification Standard Training Development Officer Occupational Qualification (ADGA) 30 July 04﻿ =====

=
﻿TP: (No Not assigned) TRAINING DEVELOPMENT OFFICER OCCUPATIONAL QUALIFICATION ADGA 30 July 09 =====

=
﻿CFITES : A-P9-050 Series, Canadian Forces Manuals of Individual Training and Education. [Brad - OK this is a ref for the ref page, let's not forget to put it in the final doc] =====

__Evaluation Work__